Select a plant from the dropdown above to view its performance detail and organisation history.
295
Plants Reporting
2.45 GWh
Generation This Month
527.6 M TL
Imbalance Cost This Month
39.2%
Median Imbalance %
+3.0pp vs vs prev. month
236 TL/MWh
Sector Unit Cost
Plant Ranking – May 2026
| Rank | Plant | Imbalance (%) | Unit Cost (TL/MWh) | Generation (MWh) | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOMA RES(SOMA ENR.) | 20.3% | 230.41 | 27,523 | 6,341,609 |
| 2 | TATLIPINAR RES | 20.7% | 114.33 | 36,206 | 4,139,234 |
| 3 | ÖRLEMİŞ RES | 20.9% | 106.61 | 8,277 | 882,332 |
| 4 | GÖKÇEDAĞ RES | 22.8% | 158.71 | 15,551 | 2,468,125 |
| 5 | BERGRES RES | 22.9% | 130.10 | 13,467 | 1,752,040 |
| 6 | ŞAPDAĞI RES | 23.3% | 140.66 | 12,624 | 1,775,671 |
| 7 | ÜÇPINAR RES | 24.0% | 120.43 | 30,791 | 3,708,054 |
| 8 | SAROS RES | 24.6% | 163.44 | 42,164 | 6,891,436 |
| 9 | GAZİOSMANPAŞA RES | 25.5% | 171.20 | 13,114 | 2,245,128 |
| 10 | SÜLOĞLU RES | 25.6% | 219.58 | 13,480 | 2,959,898 |
| 11 | URLA RES | 25.8% | 154.24 | 3,058 | 471,681 |
| 12 | BAFA RES | 26.0% | 113.32 | 12,100 | 1,371,150 |
| 13 | DEMİRCİLİ RES | 26.1% | 130.34 | 8,003 | 1,043,101 |
| 14 | GÜLPINAR RES | 26.5% | 128.53 | 38,601 | 4,961,286 |
| 15 | DEMİRCİLER RES(İMBAT) | 26.8% | 141.39 | 7,603 | 1,074,989 |
| 16 | KARADAĞ RES(BOYUT) | 26.8% | 168.41 | 4,412 | 743,053 |
| 17 | GELİBOLU RES | 26.9% | 143.85 | 6,114 | 879,480 |
| 18 | AKYEL-2 RES | 27.0% | 155.41 | 5,500 | 854,756 |
| 19 | GELİBOLU RES AYVACIK | 27.0% | 121.54 | 5,684 | 690,855 |
| 20 | AKHİSAR RES | 27.0% | 174.69 | 7,388 | 1,290,589 |
| 21 | Kavaklı RES | 27.0% | 258.98 | 8,909 | 2,307,230 |
| 22 | VİZE-2 RES | 27.4% | 179.01 | 20,539 | 3,676,617 |
| 23 | PAZARKÖY RES | 27.6% | 177.77 | 14,681 | 2,609,936 |
| 24 | BARBAROS RES | 27.8% | 205.84 | 2,692 | 554,049 |
| 25 | DATÇA RES | 28.3% | 150.85 | 3,463 | 522,327 |
| 26 | ÇAYPINAR RES | 28.6% | 285.85 | 6,953 | 1,987,687 |
| 27 | KIYIKÖY RES(BEŞİKTEPE ENR.) | 28.7% | 232.64 | 7,716 | 1,795,163 |
| 28 | KARABURUN RES | 28.8% | 201.66 | 24,478 | 4,936,045 |
| 29 | EDİNCİK RES | 28.8% | 177.42 | 13,751 | 2,439,777 |
| 30 | YUNTDAĞ RES | 29.1% | 189.41 | 7,844 | 1,485,653 |
| 31 | GÖKTEPE RES | 29.1% | 190.98 | 22,883 | 4,370,217 |
| 32 | KURTKAYASI RES(ARE) | 29.5% | 169.94 | 14,555 | 2,473,469 |
| 33 | SÖKE RES | 29.5% | 161.03 | 15,701 | 2,528,487 |
| 34 | YAYLAKÖY RES | 29.5% | 144.74 | 2,699 | 390,685 |
| 35 | TİRE RES | 29.6% | 173.99 | 9,090 | 1,581,641 |
| 36 | SİBELRES RES | 29.7% | 174.05 | 16,504 | 2,872,542 |
| 37 | HACI BEY RES | 29.8% | 218.20 | 13,398 | 2,923,488 |
| 38 | G RES | 29.9% | 140.56 | 3,511 | 493,583 |
| 39 | KÜREKDAĞI RES | 30.0% | 190.71 | 9,921 | 1,892,065 |
| 40 | AYDOS RES | 30.0% | 185.75 | 4,186 | 777,537 |
| 41 | AKYEL-1 RES | 30.1% | 139.71 | 20,090 | 2,806,830 |
| 42 | SARITEPE RES | 30.1% | 182.24 | 19,429 | 3,540,759 |
| 43 | ALİBEY RES | 30.3% | 183.28 | 12,681 | 2,324,180 |
| 44 | HASANOBA RES | 30.5% | 181.38 | 14,149 | 2,566,256 |
| 45 | MANASTIR-ESENKÖY RES | 30.6% | 176.82 | 8,464 | 1,496,491 |
| 46 | POYRAZ RES(NM ENR.) | 30.6% | 208.09 | 6,084 | 1,265,925 |
| 47 | KARADERE RES | 30.6% | 168.27 | 5,012 | 843,401 |
| 48 | SOMA RES(BİLGİN ENR.) | 30.9% | 360.22 | 10,754 | 3,873,625 |
| 49 | YALOVA RES | 30.9% | 207.39 | 8,600 | 1,783,476 |
| 50 | ŞAH RES | 31.0% | 279.05 | 13,612 | 3,798,319 |
This dashboard is built on publicly available settlement data from EPİAŞ (Turkish Energy Exchange). The metrics below explain exactly how each figure is computed.
Data Source
All production, imbalance, and KÜPST figures are drawn from the EPİAŞ Real-Time Settlement (Gerçek Zamanlı Uzlaştırma / GZU) reports. Data is fetched at hourly resolution via the public EPIAS Transparency Platform REST API (eptr2) and aggregated to monthly plant-level summaries. The dataset covers all licensed solar (GES) or wind (RES) power plants that reported at least one hour of production in the analysis period.
Imbalance Cost
Imbalance cost arises when a plant's actual hourly generation differs from its day-ahead schedule. Settlement is system-direction-dependent: positive imbalance (plant produced more than scheduled) is settled on min(MCP, SMP); negative imbalance (produced less) on max(MCP, SMP).
- Until Dec 2025 — flat 3% margin: positive at min(MCP, SMP) × 0.97, negative at max(MCP, SMP) × 1.03.
- From Jan 2026 (EPDK regulation, Official Gazette 29/12/2025) — the margin depends on whether the plant's deviation aggravates or relieves the system. A deviation in the same direction as the system imbalance is charged 6% (positive × 0.94, negative × 1.06); a deviation that helps the system keeps the 3% margin (positive × 0.97, negative × 1.03).
KÜPST Cost
KÜPST (Katılım Ücreti ve Perakende Satış Tarifesi Primi) is a penalty levied when a plant's monthly net imbalance exceeds a regulatory tolerance band:
- Solar (GES): 8% of monthly generation (10% before Jan 2026)
- Wind (RES): 15% of monthly generation (17% before Jan 2026)
Unit Cost (TL/MWh)
Unit cost = (Total Imbalance Cost + Total KÜPST Cost) ÷ Total Generation for the month, expressed in TL/MWh. It provides a scale-independent measure of settlement efficiency, allowing fair comparison across plants of different capacity.
Plant Rankings
Plants are ranked by their monthly imbalance percentage, defined as |Net Imbalance MWh| ÷ Generation MWh × 100. A lower value indicates better forecast accuracy. The bar chart shows the best and worst performers for the selected month; the full ranked list appears in the table below.
Coverage & Exclusions
KARAPINAR YEKA-1 (≈1,365 MW) is excluded from fleet statistics because its scale disproportionately skews sector averages; it is reported separately where applicable. Plants with zero reported generation in a given month are excluded from that month's ranking but remain in the registry.