Select a plant from the dropdown above to view its performance detail and organisation history.
The costs in this report are derived from data published on the EPİAŞ Transparency Platform. They reflect the financial value, as imbalance charges and KÜPST, of the difference between each plant's final production plan (KUDÜP) and its settled generation (UEVM). This cost does not depend on forecast performance alone: nomination strategy, portfolio management decisions, maintenance and outages, curtailment and balancing instructions (YAL/YAT) and system direction all shape the final figure, and public data cannot separate these effects. The report is therefore not, on its own, a sufficient basis for assessing the performance of individual plants or portfolios.
57 Plants Reporting
0.36 GWh Generation This Month
26.9 M TL Imbalance Cost This Month
12.5% Median Imbalance % +1.9pp vs vs prev. month
85 TL/MWh Sector Unit Cost

Plant Ranking – September 2026

Plant Imbalance (%) Unit Cost (TL/MWh) Generation (MWh) Total Cost
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-8 GES 7.4% 43.07 11,604 499,807
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-5 GES 7.8% 42.94 11,543 495,645
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-7 GES 7.9% 43.95 11,582 509,054
CINGILLI GES 8.0% 64.85 5,616 364,231
G4-BOR3 GES 8.3% 59.44 25,403 1,510,086
ÖZMEN-1 GES 8.7% 58.44 3,116 182,118
G4-BOR2 GES 9.8% 75.41 25,147 1,896,289
MT GES 10.3% 84.20 1,929 162,434
OMİCRON ERCİŞ GES 10.5% 68.21 1,979 134,978
G3-GAZİANTEP-1-1 GES 10.6% 70.91 4,844 343,443
EDİKLİ GES 10.6% 65.45 2,132 139,528
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-6 GES 10.6% 57.80 11,869 686,040
ÖZGÜÇLÜ GES 10.9% 66.99 2,141 143,387
OMİCRON ENGİL208 GES 10.9% 70.65 1,973 139,384
G3-GAZİANTEP-2-1 GES 11.0% 72.52 4,776 346,357
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-9 GES 11.1% 63.53 11,725 744,950
KÜÇÜKKÖY GES 11.1% 83.04 4,303 357,337
G4-ERZİN-2 GES 11.2% 86.51 21,696 1,877,014
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-3 GES 11.2% 68.02 11,319 769,955
GİTAŞ-1 GES 11.3% 89.32 1,863 166,427
GÜN GÜNEŞ ANTALYA AKSEKİ BÜYÜKALAN 1 GES 11.5% 84.49 4,978 420,543
G3-GAZİANTEP-3-1 GES 11.6% 75.32 2,374 178,829
GÜN GÜNEŞ VAN ARISU GES 11.6% 69.47 11,057 768,110
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-2 GES 11.9% 73.48 11,976 879,983
İOTA M. FIRINCI GES 12.1% 83.33 1,946 162,134
G4-BOR-1 GES 12.1% 83.41 24,324 2,028,918
APA GES 12.2% 93.65 2,298 215,258
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-4 GES 12.4% 65.37 10,715 700,431
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-1 GES 12.5% 78.61 9,177 721,373
G4-VİRANŞEHİR-10 GES 12.7% 80.82 12,254 990,386
BÜGET GES(ULUDER) 13.0% 88.64 1,923 170,491
FERNAS-4 GES 13.3% 102.65 4,493 461,216
PSİ ENGİL207 GES 13.5% 87.28 2,119 184,919
HAMAL GES 13.5% 98.43 1,712 168,561
METGES BURDUR GES 14.3% 122.72 1,367 167,790
G4-ERZİN-1 GES 14.4% 93.24 22,092 2,059,908
AFTA GES 14.7% 130.52 2,094 273,303
G24-KÜTAHYA GES 15.3% 118.63 7,774 922,223
ALİBEYHÖYÜĞÜ GES 15.4% 118.72 3,558 422,386
SİLOPİ GES 15.8% 109.24 1,302 142,250
RA GÜNEŞ MARDİN GES 16.3% 99.05 1,965 194,592
DENİZLİ TAVAS GES 17.4% 132.88 878 116,617
SERRA GES 17.7% 113.17 1,155 130,717
G3-AĞRI-1-2 GES 18.4% 130.12 2,751 357,985
ALİBEY GES 18.7% 115.01 1,066 122,550
G3-AĞRI-2-2 GES 19.3% 138.52 2,726 377,646
ALAGES ADİLCEVAZ GES 20.1% 115.36 3,197 368,814
SOLENTEGRE GES 20.7% 115.67 1,160 134,235
KIVANÇ-2 GES 20.9% 174.31 8,264 1,440,485
YAYSUN GES 22.9% 168.13 1,552 261,011
BÜGET GES(KAROMAD) 23.6% 153.41 1,458 223,729
HALK ENERJİ ERZURUM GES 27.3% 157.92 741 117,049
TAŞKESİĞİ GES 27.9% 187.56 1,701 318,997
YENİ GES 27.9% 117.31 9,166 1,075,276
TOZOR GES 29.0% 173.77 1,938 336,728
RENOE ACIPAYAM GES 30.1% 184.55 1,524 281,188
TEKSİN GES 32.4% 269.65 5,327 1,436,381

Operators who believe a figure for their plant is incorrect can request a review through the Algopoly report page.

Notes on individual plants

These notes state what the published data shows about a plant's month. They do not explain why it happened, because public data cannot establish that.

  • KIVANÇ-2 GES: most of this month's deviation from the published forecast occurred on three days (days 10, 11, 12).
  • HALK ENERJİ ERZURUM GES: on 2 day(s) a forecast was published but there was little or no output.
  • YENİ GES: this is the first full period for this unit in the report.
  • TOZOR GES: this is the first full period for this unit in the report.

This dashboard is built on publicly available settlement data from EPİAŞ (Turkish Energy Exchange). The metrics below explain exactly how each figure is computed.

Data Source
All production, imbalance, and KÜPST figures are drawn from the EPİAŞ Real-Time Settlement (Gerçek Zamanlı Uzlaştırma / GZU) reports. Data is fetched at hourly resolution via the public EPIAS Transparency Platform REST API (eptr2) and aggregated to monthly plant-level summaries. The dataset covers all licensed solar (GES) or wind (RES) power plants that reported at least one hour of production in the analysis period.
Imbalance Ratio (%)
The imbalance ratio measures how much a plant's hourly generation deviates from its day-ahead schedule, relative to what it actually produced. For each hour we take the absolute difference between the forecast (KÜDÜP) and the actual settlement quantity (UEVM), sum these over the month, and divide by total actual generation:
Imbalance % = Σ |KÜDÜP − UEVM| (hourly) ÷ Σ UEVM (monthly) × 100
Because the hourly differences are taken in absolute value, over-production hours and under-production hours do not cancel out — both count as imbalance. The metric therefore captures hourly forecasting volatility and is scale-independent, so plants of different sizes compare fairly. The separate net imbalance (signed sum, where surplus and deficit hours offset) is typically much smaller and is reported as a distinct figure.
Imbalance Cost
Imbalance cost arises when a plant's actual hourly generation differs from its day-ahead schedule. Settlement is system-direction-dependent: positive imbalance (plant produced more than scheduled) is settled on min(MCP, SMP); negative imbalance (produced less) on max(MCP, SMP).
  • Until Dec 2025 — flat 3% margin: positive at min(MCP, SMP) × 0.97, negative at max(MCP, SMP) × 1.03.
  • From Jan 2026 (EPDK regulation, Official Gazette 29/12/2025) — the margin depends on whether the plant's deviation aggravates or relieves the system. A deviation in the same direction as the system imbalance is charged 6% (positive × 0.94, negative × 1.06); a deviation that helps the system keeps the 3% margin (positive × 0.97, negative × 1.03).
Figures use EPİAŞ's published hourly imbalance prices, which already embed the applicable system-direction coefficient. The reported monthly value is the total imbalance cost (TL) — every hour is charged on the absolute size of its own deviation, so over- and under-forecast hours add up rather than cancel out.
KÜPST Cost
KÜPST (Kesinleşmiş Üretim Planından Sapma Tutarı — deviation-from-final-schedule charge) is a penalty applied hour by hour, whenever an hour's deviation from the final schedule (KUDÜP) exceeds a regulatory tolerance band set as a share of that hour's schedule:
  • Solar (GES): 8% of the hour's KUDÜP (10% before Jan 2026)
  • Wind (RES): 15% of the hour's KUDÜP (17% before Jan 2026)
The KÜPST unit price is 5% of max(MCP, SMP, 750 TL/MWh) for the relevant hour from January 2026 (3% until December 2025). Only the portion of an hour's deviation that exceeds the tolerance band attracts the penalty; the monthly figure is the sum over all hours.
Unit Cost (TL/MWh)
Unit cost = (Total Imbalance Cost + Total KÜPST Cost) ÷ Total Generation for the month, expressed in TL/MWh. It provides a scale-independent measure of settlement efficiency, allowing fair comparison across plants of different capacity.
Plant Rankings
Plants are ordered by their monthly imbalance percentage: the sum of absolute hourly differences between the published forecast (KUDÜP) and settled generation (UEVM), divided by generation, × 100. Hours do not offset each other. The figure reflects forecasting but also curtailment, outages and balancing instructions, which public data cannot separate, so it is not a measure of forecast skill alone. Differences between neighbouring plants are largely statistical noise, so the public table lists plants in order without rank numbers. Plants whose data does not allow a fair comparison (for example a partial month, very low generation, output far below the unit's usual level, or a day without a published forecast) are not ranked and are listed with the reason.
Coverage & Exclusions
A plant is excluded from a given month's ranking — while remaining in the registry — in either of these cases:
  • Zero activity: the plant reported zero generation and zero forecast for the whole month.
  • Insufficient forecast coverage: the plant has both a forecast and an actual value for less than half of the month's hours — typically a unit commissioned or registered mid-month. Its imbalance ratio would not be comparable with a full-month plant, so it is listed rather than ranked.
Every excluded plant is listed below with its reason.

KARAPINAR YEKA-1 (approx. 1,365 MW) is excluded from the plant statistics due to its outsized scale. Its performance is reported separately.

Plants excluded this month

ELAZIĞ HİBRİT BES/GESZero production and zero forecast for the entire period — not ranked
ALİAĞA-1 GESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
ARTUKLU-1 GESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
G24-MALATYA GESThe published forecast (KUDÜP) is zero on at least one day with production — the monthly ratio is not comparable with plants forecast every day, so not ranked
IĞDIR DGESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
LÜM_İLETİM_GÜLSAN GES_5.1.H(ST)_GÜNEŞThe published forecast (KUDÜP) is zero on at least one day with production — the monthly ratio is not comparable with plants forecast every day, so not ranked
ME-SE GESImbalance ratio above our 75% review threshold — not assessable from public data, so not ranked
NEPSUN HADİM GESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
OZE DEPOLAMALI GESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
PAMUK GESNot ranked under our policy for storage-integrated and balancing-market units, whose deviations cannot be separated from balancing instructions using public data
SOLANA KONYA GESGeneration below 500 MWh for the period — too small for a reliable imbalance ratio, so not ranked
This report is based entirely on publicly available data published by EPİAŞ. All figures are derived from open settlement data; Algopoly accepts no liability for decisions made based on this content.