Select a plant from the dropdown above to view its performance detail and organisation history.
56 Plants Reporting
0.46 GWh Generation This Month
22.0 M TL Imbalance Cost This Month
8.7% Median Imbalance % -4.0pp vs vs prev. month
54 TL/MWh Sector Unit Cost

Plant Ranking – July 2026

Rank Plant Imbalance (%) Unit Cost (TL/MWh) Generation (MWh) Total Cost
1 ÖZMEN-1 GES 4.4% 24.43 3,612 88,216
2 G3-GAZİANTEP-1-1 GES 4.7% 28.03 6,693 187,584
3 AFTA GES 4.9% 23.61 2,535 59,853
4 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-4 GES 5.3% 37.69 15,796 595,352
5 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-9 GES 5.5% 32.81 15,861 520,349
6 G4-BOR3 GES 5.5% 32.69 33,061 1,080,785
7 G3-GAZİANTEP-2-1 GES 5.6% 30.49 6,624 201,930
8 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-1 GES 5.7% 36.85 13,087 482,204
9 G4-BOR2 GES 5.8% 37.70 33,128 1,249,026
10 KIVANÇ-2 GES 5.8% 33.60 11,316 380,244
11 SOLANA KONYA GES 6.0% 30.07 571 17,162
12 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-7 GES 6.3% 39.59 15,324 606,624
13 GÜN GÜNEŞ ANTALYA AKSEKİ BÜYÜKALAN 1 GES 6.7% 34.44 6,140 211,449
14 G3-GAZİANTEP-3-1 GES 6.7% 44.49 3,309 147,246
15 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-5 GES 6.8% 41.12 15,319 629,952
16 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-8 GES 6.8% 43.96 15,341 674,424
17 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-3 GES 6.9% 42.44 15,839 672,187
18 İOTA M. FIRINCI GES 7.0% 39.39 2,449 96,457
19 G4-BOR-1 GES 7.0% 39.37 33,066 1,301,867
20 CINGILLI GES 7.0% 41.56 6,388 265,500
21 HAMAL GES 7.3% 47.51 2,139 101,606
22 OMİCRON ERCİŞ GES 7.7% 46.99 2,223 104,456
23 EDİKLİ GES 8.1% 41.06 2,527 103,751
24 OMİCRON ENGİL208 GES 8.2% 39.16 2,234 87,510
25 ÖZGÜÇLÜ GES 8.2% 35.88 2,409 86,408
26 TEKSİN GES 8.3% 37.14 7,494 278,377
27 YAYSUN GES 8.7% 43.23 2,122 91,715
28 METGES BURDUR GES 8.7% 42.52 1,733 73,688
29 FERNAS-4 GES 8.7% 49.24 5,521 271,824
30 GÜN GÜNEŞ VAN ARISU GES 9.1% 49.74 13,449 668,959
31 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-6 GES 9.5% 62.72 16,462 1,032,409
32 SİLOPİ GES 9.6% 42.85 1,577 67,554
33 APA GES 9.7% 47.70 2,845 135,680
34 PSİ ENGİL207 GES 10.1% 46.75 2,432 113,702
35 KÜÇÜKKÖY GES 10.6% 68.24 5,089 347,284
36 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-2 GES 11.2% 70.36 16,467 1,158,720
37 GİTAŞ-1 GES 11.4% 59.61 2,310 137,687
38 MT GES 11.6% 52.25 2,094 109,388
39 RA GÜNEŞ MARDİN GES 12.2% 93.49 2,689 251,438
40 G4-ERZİN-1 GES 12.3% 71.93 27,099 1,949,228
41 ALAGES ADİLCEVAZ GES 12.3% 86.20 4,032 347,590
42 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-10 GES 12.4% 82.06 16,902 1,387,032
43 DENİZLİ TAVAS GES 13.0% 78.52 1,123 88,168
44 G4-ERZİN-2 GES 13.2% 84.67 27,259 2,308,087
45 BÜGET GES(ULUDER) 13.4% 64.39 2,192 141,136
46 G3-AĞRI-1-2 GES 14.3% 93.97 3,308 310,824
47 ALİBEY GES 15.2% 66.43 1,303 86,561
48 G3-AĞRI-2-2 GES 16.2% 102.06 3,264 333,145
49 BÜGET GES(KAROMAD) 16.4% 75.11 1,719 129,136
50 RENOE ACIPAYAM GES 16.9% 106.63 2,353 250,912
51 G24-KÜTAHYA GES 17.8% 115.67 9,940 1,149,670
52 HALK ENERJİ ERZURUM GES 20.4% 105.26 956 100,612
53 ALİBEYHÖYÜĞÜ GES 20.5% 126.25 4,369 551,532
54 SERRA GES 25.1% 140.56 1,367 192,101
55 SOLENTEGRE GES 29.8% 159.02 1,271 202,131
56 TAŞKESİĞİ GES 35.9% 226.59 1,835 415,765

This dashboard is built on publicly available settlement data from EPİAŞ (Turkish Energy Exchange). The metrics below explain exactly how each figure is computed.

Data Source
All production, imbalance, and KÜPST figures are drawn from the EPİAŞ Real-Time Settlement (Gerçek Zamanlı Uzlaştırma / GZU) reports. Data is fetched at hourly resolution via the public EPIAS Transparency Platform REST API (eptr2) and aggregated to monthly plant-level summaries. The dataset covers all licensed solar (GES) or wind (RES) power plants that reported at least one hour of production in the analysis period.
Imbalance Ratio (%)
The imbalance ratio measures how much a plant's hourly generation deviates from its day-ahead schedule, relative to what it actually produced. For each hour we take the absolute difference between the forecast (KÜDÜP) and the actual settlement quantity (UEVM), sum these over the month, and divide by total actual generation:
Imbalance % = Σ |KÜDÜP − UEVM| (hourly) ÷ Σ UEVM (monthly) × 100
Because the hourly differences are taken in absolute value, over-production hours and under-production hours do not cancel out — both count as imbalance. The metric therefore captures hourly forecasting volatility and is scale-independent, so plants of different sizes compare fairly. The separate net imbalance (signed sum, where surplus and deficit hours offset) is typically much smaller and is reported as a distinct figure.
Imbalance Cost
Imbalance cost arises when a plant's actual hourly generation differs from its day-ahead schedule. Settlement is system-direction-dependent: positive imbalance (plant produced more than scheduled) is settled on min(MCP, SMP); negative imbalance (produced less) on max(MCP, SMP).
  • Until Dec 2025 — flat 3% margin: positive at min(MCP, SMP) × 0.97, negative at max(MCP, SMP) × 1.03.
  • From Jan 2026 (EPDK regulation, Official Gazette 29/12/2025) — the margin depends on whether the plant's deviation aggravates or relieves the system. A deviation in the same direction as the system imbalance is charged 6% (positive × 0.94, negative × 1.06); a deviation that helps the system keeps the 3% margin (positive × 0.97, negative × 1.03).
Figures use EPİAŞ's published hourly imbalance prices, which already embed the applicable system-direction coefficient. The reported monthly value is the total imbalance cost (TL) — every hour is charged on the absolute size of its own deviation, so over- and under-forecast hours add up rather than cancel out.
KÜPST Cost
KÜPST (Kesinleşmiş Üretim Planından Sapma Tutarı — deviation-from-final-schedule charge) is a penalty applied hour by hour, whenever an hour's deviation from the final schedule (KUDÜP) exceeds a regulatory tolerance band set as a share of that hour's schedule:
  • Solar (GES): 8% of the hour's KUDÜP (10% before Jan 2026)
  • Wind (RES): 15% of the hour's KUDÜP (17% before Jan 2026)
The KÜPST unit price is 5% of max(MCP, SMP, 750 TL/MWh) for the relevant hour from January 2026 (3% until December 2025). Only the portion of an hour's deviation that exceeds the tolerance band attracts the penalty; the monthly figure is the sum over all hours.
Unit Cost (TL/MWh)
Unit cost = (Total Imbalance Cost + Total KÜPST Cost) ÷ Total Generation for the month, expressed in TL/MWh. It provides a scale-independent measure of settlement efficiency, allowing fair comparison across plants of different capacity.
Plant Rankings
Plants are ranked by their monthly imbalance percentage, defined as |Net Imbalance MWh| ÷ Generation MWh × 100. A lower value indicates better forecast accuracy. The bar chart shows the best and worst performers for the selected month; the full ranked list appears in the table below.
Coverage & Exclusions
A plant is excluded from a given month's ranking — while remaining in the registry — in either of these cases:
  • Zero activity: the plant reported zero generation and zero forecast for the whole month.
  • Insufficient forecast coverage: the plant has both a forecast and an actual value for less than half of the month's hours — typically a unit commissioned or registered mid-month. Its imbalance ratio would not be comparable with a full-month plant, so it is listed rather than ranked.
Every excluded plant is listed below with its reason.

KARAPINAR YEKA-1 (approx. 1,365 MW) is excluded from the plant statistics due to its outsized scale. Its performance is reported separately.

Plants excluded this month

ELAZIĞ HİBRİT BES/GESZero production and zero forecast for the entire period
G24-KARAPINAR GESInsufficient forecast coverage (26/744 hours with both forecast and actual) — plant likely commissioned or registered mid-period
G24-MALATYA GESInsufficient forecast coverage (57/744 hours with both forecast and actual) — plant likely commissioned or registered mid-period
ALİAĞA-1 GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
ARTUKLU-1 GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
IĞDIR DGESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
ME-SE GESAnomalously high imbalance — set aside as not representative of forecast performance
NEPSUN HADİM GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
OZE DEPOLAMALI GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
PAMUK GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
This report is based entirely on publicly available data published by EPİAŞ. All figures are derived from open settlement data; Algopoly accepts no liability for decisions made based on this content.