Select a plant from the dropdown above to view its performance detail and organisation history.
56 Plants Reporting
0.24 GWh Generation This Month
39.8 M TL Imbalance Cost This Month
27.3% Median Imbalance % -6.8pp vs vs prev. month
187 TL/MWh Sector Unit Cost

Plant Ranking – March 2026

Rank Plant Imbalance (%) Unit Cost (TL/MWh) Generation (MWh) Total Cost
1 FERNAS-4 GES 16.1% 124.55 4,156 517,628
2 TAŞKESİĞİ GES 16.2% 118.53 1,797 212,957
3 GÜN GÜNEŞ ANTALYA AKSEKİ BÜYÜKALAN 1 GES 18.9% 102.99 4,249 437,606
4 MT GES 21.0% 142.27 1,649 234,667
5 ME-SE GES 21.3% 174.75 1,501 262,237
6 YAYSUN GES 21.6% 150.71 1,641 247,278
7 ÖZMEN-1 GES 21.9% 118.81 2,743 325,891
8 G4-BOR3 GES 22.0% 120.86 18,141 2,192,524
9 G4-ERZİN-1 GES 22.7% 205.04 15,633 3,205,411
10 KÜÇÜKKÖY GES 23.2% 184.18 3,706 682,511
11 EDİKLİ GES 23.3% 148.41 1,747 259,337
12 GÜN GÜNEŞ VAN ARISU GES 23.4% 140.64 8,682 1,220,968
13 G3-GAZİANTEP-2-1 GES 23.5% 195.20 3,372 658,162
14 G4-ERZİN-2 GES 23.9% 189.63 17,444 3,307,887
15 G3-GAZİANTEP-1-1 GES 24.2% 198.37 3,347 663,872
16 APA GES 24.3% 195.59 1,845 360,793
17 SERRA GES 24.5% 169.19 997 168,657
18 ALİBEYHÖYÜĞÜ GES 25.4% 180.52 2,927 528,281
19 İOTA M. FIRINCI GES 25.8% 184.67 1,484 273,976
20 G3-GAZİANTEP-3-1 GES 25.9% 208.82 1,660 346,564
21 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-5 GES 26.0% 184.32 5,811 1,071,105
22 G4-BOR2 GES 26.4% 148.29 19,677 2,917,898
23 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-7 GES 26.5% 201.56 5,805 1,170,103
24 OMİCRON ENGİL208 GES 26.5% 223.83 1,509 337,690
25 OMİCRON ERCİŞ GES 26.9% 224.87 1,510 339,495
26 PSİ ENGİL207 GES 27.0% 207.31 1,551 321,632
27 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-8 GES 27.0% 196.64 5,816 1,143,759
28 METGES BURDUR GES 27.3% 195.88 1,199 234,942
29 GİTAŞ-1 GES 27.3% 180.00 1,624 292,272
30 KIVANÇ-2 GES 27.6% 195.20 7,009 1,368,176
31 BÜGET GES(ULUDER) 28.2% 161.13 1,472 237,171
32 ÖZGÜÇLÜ GES 28.7% 245.92 1,602 393,967
33 SİLOPİ GES 28.8% 190.75 876 167,154
34 ALİBEY GES 29.5% 234.88 920 216,063
35 RENOE ACIPAYAM GES 29.6% 191.44 1,465 280,512
36 CINGILLI GES 30.5% 189.52 4,778 905,577
37 HAMAL GES 30.7% 201.51 1,272 256,236
38 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-1 GES 31.3% 223.49 4,893 1,093,488
39 AFTA GES 31.3% 249.31 1,801 449,046
40 SOLENTEGRE GES 31.7% 224.73 988 221,947
41 G3-AĞRI-1-2 GES 32.0% 238.09 1,861 443,170
42 SOLANA KONYA GES 32.1% 244.31 410 100,130
43 TEKSİN GES 33.2% 191.31 4,667 892,853
44 BÜGET GES(KAROMAD) 33.2% 207.16 1,034 214,297
45 G4-BOR-1 GES 33.3% 195.70 18,441 3,608,988
46 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-9 GES 33.6% 193.51 4,635 896,947
47 G3-AĞRI-2-2 GES 34.1% 251.12 1,802 452,583
48 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-10 GES 34.1% 243.83 6,483 1,580,726
49 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-2 GES 35.2% 235.53 6,504 1,531,934
50 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-4 GES 35.8% 231.80 4,821 1,117,594
51 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-6 GES 36.1% 239.24 6,535 1,563,334
52 G4-VİRANŞEHİR-3 GES 36.2% 245.08 5,510 1,350,289
53 DENİZLİ TAVAS GES 37.0% 271.50 843 228,931
54 RA GÜNEŞ MARDİN GES 39.0% 245.26 1,237 303,405
55 ALAGES ADİLCEVAZ GES 39.6% 182.68 2,401 438,587
56 HALK ENERJİ ERZURUM GES 56.6% 328.35 728 238,976

This dashboard is built on publicly available settlement data from EPİAŞ (Turkish Energy Exchange). The metrics below explain exactly how each figure is computed.

Data Source
All production, imbalance, and KÜPST figures are drawn from the EPİAŞ Real-Time Settlement (Gerçek Zamanlı Uzlaştırma / GZU) reports. Data is fetched at hourly resolution via the public EPIAS Transparency Platform REST API (eptr2) and aggregated to monthly plant-level summaries. The dataset covers all licensed solar (GES) or wind (RES) power plants that reported at least one hour of production in the analysis period.
Imbalance Ratio (%)
The imbalance ratio measures how much a plant's hourly generation deviates from its day-ahead schedule, relative to what it actually produced. For each hour we take the absolute difference between the forecast (KÜDÜP) and the actual settlement quantity (UEVM), sum these over the month, and divide by total actual generation:
Imbalance % = Σ |KÜDÜP − UEVM| (hourly) ÷ Σ UEVM (monthly) × 100
Because the hourly differences are taken in absolute value, over-production hours and under-production hours do not cancel out — both count as imbalance. The metric therefore captures hourly forecasting volatility and is scale-independent, so plants of different sizes compare fairly. The separate net imbalance (signed sum, where surplus and deficit hours offset) is typically much smaller and is reported as a distinct figure.
Imbalance Cost
Imbalance cost arises when a plant's actual hourly generation differs from its day-ahead schedule. Settlement is system-direction-dependent: positive imbalance (plant produced more than scheduled) is settled on min(MCP, SMP); negative imbalance (produced less) on max(MCP, SMP).
  • Until Dec 2025 — flat 3% margin: positive at min(MCP, SMP) × 0.97, negative at max(MCP, SMP) × 1.03.
  • From Jan 2026 (EPDK regulation, Official Gazette 29/12/2025) — the margin depends on whether the plant's deviation aggravates or relieves the system. A deviation in the same direction as the system imbalance is charged 6% (positive × 0.94, negative × 1.06); a deviation that helps the system keeps the 3% margin (positive × 0.97, negative × 1.03).
Figures use EPİAŞ's published hourly imbalance prices, which already embed the applicable system-direction coefficient. The reported monthly value is the net imbalance cost (TL) — the algebraic sum of positive and negative settlement differences over all hours.
KÜPST Cost
KÜPST (Katılım Ücreti ve Perakende Satış Tarifesi Primi) is a penalty levied when a plant's monthly net imbalance exceeds a regulatory tolerance band:
  • Solar (GES): 8% of monthly generation (10% before Jan 2026)
  • Wind (RES): 15% of monthly generation (17% before Jan 2026)
The KÜPST unit price equals 3% of max(MCP, SMP, 750 TL/MWh) for the relevant hour. Only the portion of imbalance that exceeds the tolerance band attracts the penalty.
Unit Cost (TL/MWh)
Unit cost = (Total Imbalance Cost + Total KÜPST Cost) ÷ Total Generation for the month, expressed in TL/MWh. It provides a scale-independent measure of settlement efficiency, allowing fair comparison across plants of different capacity.
Plant Rankings
Plants are ranked by their monthly imbalance percentage, defined as |Net Imbalance MWh| ÷ Generation MWh × 100. A lower value indicates better forecast accuracy. The bar chart shows the best and worst performers for the selected month; the full ranked list appears in the table below.
Coverage & Exclusions
A plant is excluded from a given month's ranking — while remaining in the registry — in either of these cases:
  • Zero activity: the plant reported zero generation and zero forecast for the whole month.
  • Insufficient forecast coverage: the plant has both a forecast and an actual value for less than half of the month's hours — typically a unit commissioned or registered mid-month. Its imbalance ratio would not be comparable with a full-month plant, so it is listed rather than ranked.
Every excluded plant is listed below with its reason.

KARAPINAR YEKA-1 (approx. 1,365 MW) is excluded from the plant statistics due to its outsized scale. Its performance is reported separately.

Plants excluded this month

ELAZIĞ HİBRİT BES/GESZero production and zero forecast for the entire period
ALİAĞA-1 GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
ARTUKLU-1 GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
IĞDIR DGESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
OZE DEPOLAMALI GESBalancing Power Market (DGP) participant / commanded curtailment — not a forecast imbalance
This report is based entirely on publicly available data published by EPİAŞ. All figures are derived from open settlement data; Algopoly accepts no liability for decisions made based on this content.